An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 m (PM10, PM4, PM2.5, PM1) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS®, GLO®, JUUL®, with dierent kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM1 size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM1 concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM1 concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL®—depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS® and GLO®. Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 g m3 (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the dierent way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS® and GLO® indoor PM1 concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 g m3, especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places.

Impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels / Protano, Carmela; Manigrasso, Maurizio; Cammalleri, Vittoria; Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe; Frati, Giacomo; Avino, Pasquale; Vitali, Matteo. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1660-4601. - 17:8(2020), pp. 1-10. [10.3390/ijerph17082947]

Impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels

Protano, Carmela
Primo
;
Cammalleri, Vittoria;Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe;Frati, Giacomo;Vitali, Matteo
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 m (PM10, PM4, PM2.5, PM1) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS®, GLO®, JUUL®, with dierent kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM1 size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM1 concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM1 concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL®—depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS® and GLO®. Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 g m3 (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the dierent way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS® and GLO® indoor PM1 concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 g m3, especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places.
2020
indoor air; particulate matter; electronic cigarettes; heat-not-burn products; iqos®; glo®; juul®; passive smoking
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels / Protano, Carmela; Manigrasso, Maurizio; Cammalleri, Vittoria; Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe; Frati, Giacomo; Avino, Pasquale; Vitali, Matteo. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1660-4601. - 17:8(2020), pp. 1-10. [10.3390/ijerph17082947]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Protano_Impact_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.29 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1391826
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact